In December 2024, President Joe Biden pardoned his son, Hunter Biden, for federal gun and tax offenses. In his defense of this decision, President Biden made several claims that have been fact-checked and found to be false or inaccurate.
President Biden’s Claims:
- Selective Prosecution: President Biden asserted that the charges against his son were politically motivated and selectively applied.
- Unprecedented Prosecution: He claimed that Hunter Biden was the first child of a sitting U.S. president to face such legal challenges.
Fact-Check Findings:
- Selective Prosecution: Special Counsel David Weiss, who led the investigation into Hunter Biden, refuted the claim of selective prosecution. In a report released on January 13, 2025, Weiss stated that the charges were the result of “thorough, impartial investigations, not partisan politics.” WDSU
- Unprecedented Prosecution: While Hunter Biden is the first child of a sitting president to face criminal charges, this fact alone does not imply that the prosecution was unprecedented or unjust. The legal proceedings were conducted based on evidence and in accordance with federal law.
Implications:
The fact-checking of President Biden’s defense highlights the importance of accurate information in public discourse, especially concerning legal matters involving public figures. Misinformation can undermine public trust in the justice system and the integrity of legal proceedings.
For a comprehensive understanding of the fact-checking process and the specific claims made, refer to the detailed analysis provided by CNN.
Special Counsel Defends Investigation into Hunter Biden
New York PostBitter old man Joe Biden goes out in a cloud of lies – good riddance
